Popcorn #4: Noise


By Hans Fruck - Posted on 09 May 2007

In a caravan out in the suburbs.In a caravan out in the suburbs.

This week Hans and Simone square-off and offer different perspectives on new Australian film Noise.

HANS' REVIEW:

From its brilliantly conceived and shot opening to its riveting climax, Australian film Noise is a tour de force. The debut feature of director Mathew Saville, Noise tells the story of Constable Graham McGahan (Brendan Cowell). McGahan suffers chronic tinnitus (ringing ears), and when he keels over and faints on the beat after a severe attack, he’s grudgingly placed on “light” duty. This means manning a police information caravan in Melbourne’s outer suburbs where a young woman has been brutally murdered in an attack that may, or may not, be connected to a recent multiple murder.

The story takes some detours involving, among others, McGahan’s girlfriend; an eyewitness to the multiple murder; the fiancé of the murdered woman; and an intellectually handicapped boy who loiters around the police caravan. A measure of the script’s quality is that each of these secondary characters is more than a stereotype or plot mechanism. Rather, script and cast conspire to flesh them out with believably idiosyncratic touches.

Despite his large cast of characters, Saville keeps the film admirably focussed, controlling its pace and never losing sight of his main narrative thread. It’s an impressive storytelling feat. Equally impressive is the way Noise seamlessly shifts dramatic gears. At times the dread is excruciating, recalling another great but disturbing Australian film, The Boys. At other times, Saville and his cast effortlessly mine the smartarse dialogue for laughs between unhesitating shifts into high drama.

The secret to this fancy footwork is the performance of Cowell, which is nothing short of extraordinary. When he first slouches into the story, McGahan is disaffected and lost, his chronic tinnitus a metaphor for his disconnection. In fact, he’s so phlegmatic he seems impervious to nuance or feelings sharp enough to scar. But as the film unspools, Cowell, without losing McGahan’s laidback demeanour, shifts between sadness, humour, fear, and anger with ease, and the film follows him.

The key to Cowell’s performance, and one of the film’s main attractions, is the language. The dialogue is awash with ocker intonations and idiom. It’s thick with slang and casual profanity, such as “red hot go”, “shithead”, “fuck knuckle” and “fuckwit”. An interview between McGahan and a combustible local man best illustrates this; their rat-a-tat verbal sparing teeters on the brink of confrontation – it’s ugly but exhilarating.

Technically, Noise is accomplished. It’s a sparsely scored film – intentionally so. This gives its effects people a chance to populate the film with the sounds – cracklingly real, muffled, or echoey – of Melbourne as heard through the ears of a tinnitus sufferer. It also means that when the score does swell over the action its effect is multiplied tenfold.

Above all, Noise strives to capture the sights, sounds, and people of a particular place. This place. And there’s a thrill of recognition in seeing Melbourne on screen – from the old, grotty Met carriages to the brick veneer of the outer-middle suburbs and their cluttered, cheaply furnished interiors. This isn’t an American film in an Australian get-up. It’s an Australian story told with Australian voices.

Perhaps, just perhaps, the Australiana is occasionally too strident. But there can be truth in stridency. It’s possible to capture something by concentrating it. And that’s exactly what Noise has done. It’s the best film I’ve seen in years.

--Hans Fruck

 

SIMONE'S REVIEW: Brendan Cowell.Brendan Cowell.

It’s difficult to be sure that a negative report on a popular film isn’t fuelled by a wilfully contrary spirit. It’s also hard to be pleasantly surprised by a fervently celebrated film, drowning even before its release in a tide of effusive praise. Judge for yourself, by all means, but accept my assurance that I am a victim of hopeful enthusiasm and not spiteful snobbery. And from where I’m standing, Noise is a good film but by no means a great one. Its merits are undeniable, sure, but its flaws are pretty serious.

Like Hans here, I am awed and inspired by Brendan Cowell’s unique voice, his laconic graces and his razor-sharp timing. I am impressed by the technical accomplishment of the sound department and the cinematography, both elements used with ferocious precision to communicate and underscore the themes and narrative thrust of the film. I am satisfied by the character development, and the subtle strength of the supporting cast. Like Hans, I enjoy seeing my home town on the big screen.

Where, then, can the film falter? Well, at the script, evidently. At the plot. At the only point where a perfect execution can possibly go wrong. Noise suffers from obvious and awkward contrivance. Not once, not twice, but repeatedly throughout the film we are forced to reconcile flagrantly unlikely coincidence, brazenly artificial behaviour and totally illogical narrative facts with the great and convincing quality of their delivery. And each time we are offered these flights of fancy, it is to fuel a moment of heightened dramatic tension – to make the film move. So in effect, a wonderfully conceived sonic universe and a reasonably interesting group of characters are hitched to the trundling gimmicks of a Logie-quality cop thriller.

Would a diabetic fail to mention at a crucial moment that she was asking for her bag because she needed her insulin? This equates to the much-derided daytime TV phone call in which an accused but clearly innocent person says “just let me explain” rather than actually explaining. Would the Victorian Police Headquarters have only one female visitor a day? Possibly. But would they ask a witness to mass murder to write her name and address in a ‘visitor’s guestbook’ which the suspected murderer is later asked to sign? I called the Victorian Police Headquarters, who assured me that not only would a witness’ personal details be kept under strict and calculated guard, but that they don’t actually have a guestbook, per se. They use computers for that sort of thing.

Perhaps most aggravating, our would-be psychopath presents himself to the very police surveillance unit that has been set up to find him and all but tap-dances in his efforts to draw attention to himself. Our deafly heroic copper, undoubtedly quick-witted if a little uncaring, fails to notice. These problems, and the eternal problem of the vague inauthenticity of the Australian working-class idiom as presented by educated, middle-class artists, are what make Noise a little ordinary. By comparison to the great lumbering mediocrity of the vast majority of contemporary Australian cinema, there is much here to celebrate, and certainly much worth paying to see. But it ain’t Citizen Kane.

--Simone Ubaldi

Tags

Face OFF! I am very excited about this film and will go and see it regardless. Hans, a very impressive review and although you and I often have differing tastes, I'm taking you on your word this time. Noise (ahem) sounds great, especially since you compared it to The Boys; another Aus. film that I reckon is bonza, cobber, fair dinkum mate, yew bewdy!

Anyway, Simone, I understand where you're coming from - those little things would annoy me too, but that's just what they are, little things. Not to disparage your opinion, but where's your suspension of disbelief? Sometimes a handy little device, no matter how implausible, is necessary to move things in the right direction.

I love these double-header reviews.

Whatcha up to? Are you still living in the temple in Richmond? Or have you moved/been evicted/been chased away by the local Temperance League?

As for the implausibilities that Simone raises, I think only one of them is substantive. But honestly, I was so immersed in the film I was oblivious to them all. I think that accounts for the difference in the reviews perhaps. I had an immediate, and visceral, identification with the film. Simone obviously wasn't as enthralled and I think you can tell that from the greater critical detachment in her review. (I'm still fucking impressed that she rang up Vic Police.)

And given your track record, Vincent, you're far more likely to agree with Simone than with me.

We should all catch up for a beer. Now that I'm only working one job at a time, I've got a bit more free time.

that Simone rang the cops to check on that, too.

You done editing Beat, then?

Now, I'm just scrambling like a madman to catch up on my LP stuff.

I finally saw this film. I really enjoyed it. Superb. I didn't see any problems with it except the same mistakes that nearly all recent Australian films make when dealing with police.

1. The uniforms. They are never ironed unlike real police who starch the shit out of them. The characters in Noise would get their arse's kicked. Further, you NEVER see police commuting to work in their uniforms. They usually wear a jacket over their shirt or get dressed at work let alone roller blade home in one.

2. Shaving. Police on the beat have to always be clean shaven.

3. Weapons. Police are not allowed to take their weapons home. Also after a shot is fired, the firearm is taken for testing.

Like I said, this problem isn't confined to Noise. I'm just surprised that this attention to detail is never addressed. I would have given it 10/10 otherwise.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.