Popcorn #1: Paris Je T'Aime + Sunshine + 300


By Hans Fruck - Posted on 16 April 2007

Natalie Portman in Paris Je T'aime.Natalie Portman in Paris Je T'Aime.

This is issue #1 of Popcorn, the film column that Simone and I will be writing for Beat. We don't know how long the column will last, as it's on pretty shaky ground. With any luck, it'll stick round for a while. -Hans

PARIS JE T’AIMEMadman Cinema; released April 19

Paris Je T’Aime is a short film collection of staggering predictability and unexpected charm. Twenty-one directors were invited to lend their voices to a meditation on love in The City of Light, and like all anthologies of this kind, some parts are better than others.

The brain child of French producers Claude Ossard and Emmanuel Benbihy, the compilation features work by some of the most distinctive talents in contemporary cinema, most of whom are not native to Paris. Each seems to have faced a similar set of problems: how to make their own character heard against the overwhelming and implacable grace of Paris, and how to make a film about love in the City of Love that was not crippled by cliché.

Understandably, almost all of the directors have chosen to interpret love as something other than romance, staving off Paris’ relentless influence towards moonlit canal walks and breadsticks for two in the Latin Quarter. Instead, we see childless mothers, urban violence and adulterous husbands; we see the absence of love as much as the blossom; we see complications and compromise - and in the case of Christopher Doyle’s bizarre contribution, we see surrealist nonsense involving a Chinese dominatrix and a series of non-sequitur jump cuts set to Singapore Airlines theme song.

In the best moments of Paris Je T’Aime, we see the city, but we also see the director. Joel and Ethan Cohen (Fargo), with their uniquely American vision, pit Steve Buschemi as a guileless tourist against a subtitle-free French couple of incomprehensible aggression. His non-confrontational curiosity is his slapstick, their meaningless Europeans passions are theirs. Tom Tykwer’s (Run Lola Run) short sees the entire course of love between a beautiful American student (Natalie Portman) and her blind boyfriend fly past in the dense and frantic frames for which he is known, while Olivier Assayes (Irma Vep) works with routine opacity on the relationship between a visiting American actress (Maggie Gyllenhall) and her drug dealer.

In its more pedestrian moments, Paris Je T’Aime sees simpler artists making simpler films, with uninspiring results, such as Gurinda Chadha’s (Bend It Like Beckham) inter-racial romance, with its customarily corny conclusion, and Wes Craven’s (Nightmare on Elm Street) ghost-inspired graveyard love.

However, the gems, when they come, are well worth the wait. Unafraid of the French idiom, Triplets of Bellville director Sylvain Chomet leaps head first into a hilarious tale of mime love, while Gerard Depardieu and Frederic Auburtin (The Bridge) revel in the Autumn appeal of the sexually mature that is respected in Paris, if nowhere else. Alexander Payne (Sideways) leaves us with perhaps the sweetest, funniest and most poignant dream of Parisian romance, with his American postal worker and her stoic essay (in fluent French, although Midwest accent heavy) on the lonely holiday of her dreams. Despite her many disappointments, she falls in love with Paris - and with this wonderful conclusion, so do we.

-Simone Ubaldi

 

SUNSHINEgeneral releaseHeavenly sunburst; hellish inferno.Heavenly sunburst; hellish inferno.

Director Danny Boyle (Trainspotting) has turned his talents to science fiction with Sunshine, another collaboration with novelist Alex Garland (The Beach). The plot is simple: the sun is dying and with it all hope of life on Earth. Scientists have devised a desperate plan to reignite the sun with an enormous nuclear bomb. Aboard the inauspiciously named spacecraft Icarus II, a small multinational crew of scientists and astronauts travel toward the sun, where they will deliver their ‘payload’.

The Icarus II is convincingly imagined and the characters well-scripted. Boyle does away with cinematic pieties, foregoing character arcs and backstories for thin-lipped immediacy as humanity’s last best hope hurtles sunward. The film is ravishingly photographed – as the Icarus II closes on its destination, Boyle makes jaw-dropping use of the sun’s incandescent furnace.

Some of the plot turns – the space walk, the abandoned ship, the shipboard tension – will be familiar to anyone with a passing interest in the genre. Yet despite the well-worn parts of the story, director, cast, and cinematographer conjure up an eerie, disquieting mood.

As if the stakes aren’t high enough already, in the last half-hour Boyle ratchets up the tension with an unexpected twist. In purely cinematic terms, it’s carried out with considerable panache. But you can’t help but feel that the thrillerly turn the film takes cheapens the scenario that Boyle and his cast have so compellingly set up. It steers a film that – despite its genre nods – was bracingly strange in a too-familiar direction.

Even so, the film is well-acted, technically brilliant, and unexpectedly mystical. And, oh, the climax to the space walk of the ship’s captain, Kaneda (Hiroyuki Sanada), is among the most beautiful things you’ll see at the cinema this year.

-Hans Fruck

 

This is Sparta!This is Sparta!

300general release

Based on the real-life 480 BC battle of Thermopylae, 300 has become quite the cultural hot potato. Despite being written years before 9-11 and the inauguration of Bush the Dumber, it’s been seen by many viewers as an allegory for Bush and Iraq or, more generally, the supposed clash of civilisations between the West and Islam. This, and the film’s fascination with suspiciously fascist iconography, has earned it the thumbs down from the cultural elite. Meanwhile, the other 99% of the filmgoing public see in 300 a prettily photographed sword-n-sandal epic, nothing more.

Gerard Butler plays Spartan king Leonidas. The film’s prologue shows how the brutal Spartan system hones Leonidas into a warrior so tough he can say the silliest things without anyone giggling. When emissaries from the invading Persian king Xerxes show up in Sparta demanding that Leonidas submit to him, testosterone peaks at Vesuvian levels. Amid much high-minded rhubarbing about ‘freedom’, Leonidas photogenically tops the Persian emissaries and, undaunted by a mere 3333 to 1 numerical disadvantage, marches off with 300 Spartans to confront Xerxes’ million-man army and flaunt the size of his balls.

Director Zack Snyder (Dawn of the Dead) has faithfully adapted 300 from a Frank Miller (Sin City) comic book, and damn, doesn’t it show. Butler, who can’t act but has great abs, bellows lines better suited to speech bubbles than to films – even brainless Hollywood ones. And like so many homages to hyper-masculinity, 300 is a compendium of unintended, and hilarious, homo-eroticism.

Shot almost entirely against green screen, 300 is certainly a wonder to behold. The foundering of the Persian fleet in a storm is gorgeous and meticulously imagined, as is the play of light and wind in the cloaks of the Persian emissaries when they enter the story. Alas, unless the audience share Miller and Snyder’s fixation with chiselled abs, rippling thighs, and artistic sprays of blood, the attraction of all-you-can-eat CGI soon begins to pall. It’s as if having expended all their energy on the ‘look’ of the film, Miller and Snyder have none to spare for anything else.

Unfortunately, it’s only as an aperture into the debates swirling around it that 300 is the least bit interesting.

--Hans Fruck

For a feisty BNU argument about 300, click here.

 

 

 

Tags

Will be seeing Sunshine next weekend. Is it Kubrikesk? Great reviews guys.

*PS Hans. I was reading back over our argument and found this quote "the film's fascination with the play of light and wind on fabric was like watching a CGI version of a John Woo film." (HSF)

I didn't see it but I know what you are talking about. The Hulk for instance.

Yeah, there's a touch of 2001 about it. There's also an element of Alien. In fact, it's a bit of a compendium of several different science-fiction films. But it's put a spin of its own on the whole thing. I loved it; I'll see it again this week, and maybe write up a lengthier review.

Yeah, there's no doubting that the CGI expertise that's gone into 300 is pretty impressive. I'm not sure it's always put to the best uses, but you can't doubt the quality of the work.

Man, who did you piss off, a Spartan?

Hans Fruck wrote:
Yeah, there's a touch of 2001 about it. There's also an element of Alien. In fact, it's a bit of a compendium of several different science-fiction films. But it's put a spin of its own on the whole thing. I loved it; I'll see it again this week, and maybe write up a lengthier review.

Sweet. Looking forward to seeing it. Does anyone remember that Sci-Fi film with Sam Neil in it. The one where he bends space and time and accidentally goes to hell and back. Kinda cool in a B grade way.

The Beige Baron wrote:
Man, who did you piss off, a Spartan?

Nick's gonna put it in the magazine; I'm just not 100% sure that Town Hall have signed off on it.

I figure there's no possible way we can piss off advertisers by writing film reviews, so we're safe in that respect at least.

Baron, have you had a look at our traffic stats? Judging by the stats from our first week (since reinstalling site meter), our traffic is double what it was at the old site -- and all of this is without a BNU byline in the mag. We've got multiple pages with over 400 views, and several with more than 500 views. If we can start being a bit more organised about using DIGG and seeding hyperlinks around the net, and remember to post stuff occasionally (kinda vital that bit), we could boost unique visitors to quite a respectable level, especially if the film column becomes regular and we get a BNU byline back.

Hans Fruck wrote:

I figure there's no possible way we can piss off advertisers by writing film reviews, so we're safe in that respect at least.

Just don't mention the war/metlink.

Have you thought about tagging each post? ie for when people do a search for a film or topic?

Most of them are me. At one stage we had 30 RSS subscribers but then they all went away when I posted something.

I don't worry about how many are visiting now because then I might find I might stop enjoying all the things I love to post and maybe the audience won't like them and start bitching and then I might have to make a big dramatic exit from the internet and close my site ala a certain high-profile site.

Right Chuck?

The big ad doesn't show on the main page for me either hans.

I just got a small one for ultrasound algae removal.

By the way, I'm keen on having a box on the side with all the most popular articles. What do you reckon?

Have you seen the evil pompous loony womans new site Beigy old son? She post under her "real name" Caroline.

http://www.themotherload.com.au/

"reality parenting". Is there non-reality parenting?

She has been dying to talk babies for ages. You should join up.

I'm always on and off the site now that I've got broadband, but there's no way we account for the traffic increase.

We had 30 RSS subscribers? Is that right or are you bullshitting me? Far out, probably died of boredom during one of our dry spells.

'Reality Parenting'. 100 per cent interactive. I still prefer to jerk off manually.

The Beige Baron wrote:
'Reality Parenting'. 100 per cent interactive. I still prefer to jerk off manually.

What a fucking wank. Claudia and I have been pissing ourselves laughing. Now she is trying to be a 'superior mother'. Christ how fucking pathetic. This is what happens when you let the loonies out of the asylum.

SGS may need a hip replacement and a blue rinse I read.

We don't even have that option any more. What happened to it?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.